Published October 5, 2026 · Last reviewed October 5, 2026
Short answer: As of fall 2026 there is no federal automotive right-to-repair statute. Independent techs rely on a Clean Air Act rule that requires manufacturers to sell emissions-related service information, tools and J2534 reprogramming access; on FTC warranty protections; and on voluntary industry agreements from 2014 and 2023. Massachusetts and Maine have stronger laws that reach telematics, but both are tied up in litigation or delayed, and a narrower federal bill has only cleared a House committee.
The short version
There is still no federal automotive right-to-repair law. What independent and mobile techs actually work under is a patchwork: a long-standing federal emissions rule, federal warranty protections for your customers, voluntary industry agreements, and two state laws (Massachusetts and Maine) whose telematics provisions remain tied up. Here is what each piece gives you, and where it stops.
What federal rules already require
Emissions service information under the Clean Air Act
This is the oldest and firmest layer. According to the EPA's Freedom to Fix page (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, last updated July 1, 2026), the Clean Air Act requires manufacturers to provide "any and all information" needed to diagnose and repair emission control systems on light-duty vehicles, light-duty trucks and heavy-duty commercial trucks. EPA lists what that covers: full emissions-related service information, training materials, OBD data and enhanced diagnostics, pass-through reprogramming information, and manufacturer-specific tools for purchase. The same page says EPA issued guidance in July 2026 affirming Freedom to Fix for aftermarket repair shops.
The regulation behind it, 40 CFR 86.1808-01 (current text via Cornell Law School's Legal Information Institute), requires manufacturers to put emissions-related service information on websites, to price it at a fair and reasonable cost that considers what franchised dealers pay and what aftermarket shops can afford, to make manufacturer-specific diagnostic tools available at a fair and reasonable cost, and to support reprogramming through the SAE J2534 pass-through standard.
The limit: this rule is scoped to emissions-related systems. It is a solid legal basis for buying OEM service information and doing a powertrain reflash with a J2534 device, but on its own it does not guarantee access for every other system on the car.
Warranty protections your customers have
The FTC's consumer guide to auto warranties (Federal Trade Commission, April 2024) is blunt: "it's illegal for a dealer to deny your warranty coverage because you had routine maintenance or repairs done by someone else." It also says a warranty stays in effect when aftermarket or recycled parts are used, and that coverage can be denied only if the part is shown to have caused the damage. Two limits are worth explaining to customers: free warranty work can still be restricted to the dealer, and free warranty parts can be limited to manufacturer-approved sources.
The FTC has been on record about repair restrictions since its Nixing the Fix report to Congress (Federal Trade Commission, May 2021), which examined how manufacturers limit independent repair and recommended ways to expand consumers' repair options.
The voluntary agreements most shops rely on
Outside emissions, much day-to-day access traces to voluntary deals. The GAO report Vehicle Repair: Information on Evolving Vehicle Technologies and Consumer Choice (U.S. Government Accountability Office, GAO-24-106633, March 21, 2024) notes that most automakers operate under a 2014 voluntary right-to-repair agreement, but found from stakeholder interviews and complaint reviews that independent shops "may face some limitations in that access." GAO also reported that EVs and other new technology make repairs more complex and expensive in ways that particularly affect some independent shops, and that wireless data could give dealerships a competitive advantage, although stakeholders agreed telematics data were not then necessary for repairs.
Heavier trucks have their own agreement. Fleet Maintenance (John Hitch, June 17, 2026) describes the 2014 light-duty memorandum of understanding (MOU) and a 2015 MOU for vehicles over 14,000 lbs. GVWR.
A second light-duty pact followed in 2023. Repairer Driven News (Lurah Lowery, July 11, 2023) reported that the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, the Automotive Service Association and the Society of Collision Repair Specialists agreed that independent shops should get "the same diagnostic and repair information that auto manufacturers make available to authorized dealer networks," covering all powertrains including EVs, plus a non-proprietary vehicle interface device meeting SAE J2534 and ISO 22900. These are commitments, not statutes, which is why the main move in the current federal bill is to give the FTC power to enforce them.
Where Congress stands
The REPAIR Act (H.R. 1566) was introduced in February 2025, according to law firm Nelson Mullins (Brandon Bigelow and Dallin R. Wilson, August 24, 2026). In May 2026 its full text was set aside. Autobody News (May 28, 2026) reported that the House Energy and Commerce Committee voted 48-1 on May 21, 2026 to advance the Motor Vehicle Modernization Act (H.R. 7389), whose narrower right-to-repair title codifies the 2014 light-duty and 2015 heavy-duty MOUs and gives the FTC enforcement authority. It leaves out the REPAIR Act's requirement to provide access to vehicle data for diagnostics, repair, calibration and recalibration, and its protections for aftermarket parts production. Fleet Maintenance adds that the bill calls for an FTC study of repair barriers, with a report due in four years.
A committee vote is not a law. The bill still needs a House floor vote, Senate passage and a signature. Autobody News also noted that the bill contained no language protecting Massachusetts' stronger law, although committee leadership committed to consult that state's attorney general before a floor vote. None of the sources I read reported any floor action.
The states: Massachusetts and Maine
Massachusetts
Massachusetts voters adopted the Data Access Law by ballot initiative in 2020. Per Nelson Mullins (August 24, 2026), it requires that access to on-board diagnostic systems "shall be standardized and not require any authorization" and that telematics systems provide "inter-operable, standardized and open access." A federal district court dismissed the automaker group's challenge in February 2025, and the group appealed to the First Circuit. Repairer Driven News (Lurah Lowery, February 10, 2026) reported that at oral argument on February 3, 2026, the automakers' attorney said compliance "is possible, but it isn't possible at this time," because the independent third-party entities the law requires do not yet exist. The court suggested mediation. Nelson Mullins reports that the Attorney General declined in a February 25, 2026 letter, calling mediation "unproductive and dilatory," and that as of August 24, 2026 the court had not ruled.
Maine
Maine voters approved a similar law in 2023, per Nelson Mullins. In April 2024 the Legislature directed the Attorney General to convene a working group to recommend an entity with rulemaking and enforcement authority over telematics access under Title 29-A, section 1810. The group held 10 public meetings and its report was due February 28, 2025, according to the Office of the Maine Attorney General. Nelson Mullins reports that in April 2026 Governor Janet Mills signed LD 2211, which creates a Motor Vehicle Right to Repair Commission and moves the standardized access platform deadline to September 1, 2027, and that the automaker group filed notice on August 14, 2026 that it will keep challenging the law.
What it all means in your bay
| Layer | Binding? | What it gives an independent tech | Limits as of fall 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clean Air Act service information rule (EPA) | Yes, federal regulation | Web service information, training, enhanced diagnostics, OEM tools and J2534 reprogramming at fair and reasonable cost | Emissions-related systems only |
| FTC warranty guidance | Yes, federal law as applied by FTC | Customers keep their warranty when you do maintenance or use aftermarket parts | Free warranty work can stay dealer-only |
| 2014 light-duty and 2015 heavy-duty MOUs | Voluntary | Same diagnostic and repair information dealers get | GAO found shops may still face limits |
| 2023 data sharing commitment | Voluntary | Dealer-equal information across powertrains, standard J2534 or ISO 22900 interface | No statutory enforcement |
| Motor Vehicle Modernization Act (H.R. 7389) | Not law | Would make the MOUs FTC-enforceable | Committee-passed only; no telematics mandate |
| Massachusetts Data Access Law | Yes, in Massachusetts | Standardized, authorization-free OBD access and open telematics | On appeal; required access entities do not yet exist |
| Maine right-to-repair law | Yes, in Maine | Similar to Massachusetts | Platform deadline September 1, 2027; still being challenged |
Practical steps
- Buy access where the law backs you. Emissions-related service information, training and J2534 reprogramming must be offered to you at a fair and reasonable cost. Keep your pass-through device and subscriptions current for the makes you see most.
- Document every refusal. Write down the date, VIN, OEM site or tool, and exactly what was unavailable. GAO reported that the FTC is analyzing repair complaints in new ways, and specific records carry more weight than general frustration.
- Arm your customers with the FTC's own words. When a customer worries about the warranty, point them to the FTC guide, and give them dated, itemized invoices with part numbers.
- Do not plan purchases around telematics access yet. No source I read showed that a standardized, independent telematics platform is operating in any state.
- Watch two things: the First Circuit's Massachusetts ruling and any floor vote on H.R. 7389.
How this was researched and what to trust
I searched for current federal, state and industry developments, then opened and read each page cited here: the EPA Freedom to Fix page, the regulation text of 40 CFR 86.1808-01, two FTC pages, a GAO report, the Maine Attorney General's working group page, and reporting from Fleet Maintenance, Autobody News, Repairer Driven News and the law firm Nelson Mullins. Each fact is attributed to its publisher and date inline. Claims I could not confirm on a page I read were left out.
Federal regulatory and warranty points rest on .gov sources (EPA, FTC, GAO). The legislative and court status rests on trade press and a law firm's August 24, 2026 update, because congress.gov and mass.gov blocked automated access. This is a fast-moving area: the First Circuit could rule and Congress could act at any time after those dates, so check the current status before you rely on it for a business decision. This article is general information, not legal advice.
Common questions
Does doing maintenance at an independent shop void a car's warranty?
No. The FTC's auto warranty guide (April 2024) says it is illegal for a dealer to deny warranty coverage because routine maintenance or repairs were done by someone else, and the warranty stays in effect when aftermarket or recycled parts are used, unless the part is shown to have caused the damage. Free warranty repairs themselves can still be limited to the dealer.
Am I legally entitled to OEM scan tools and reprogramming?
For emissions-related systems, yes. EPA says the Clean Air Act requires manufacturers to provide full emissions-related service information, training, enhanced diagnostics, pass-through reprogramming information and manufacturer-specific tools for purchase. The regulation, 40 CFR 86.1808-01, ties pricing to a fair and reasonable cost and requires support for SAE J2534. For other systems, access depends mainly on voluntary industry agreements.
Can independent shops get telematics data now?
Not reliably. Massachusetts law requires open, standardized telematics access, but it is on appeal, and at the February 2026 argument the automakers' attorney said the required third-party entities do not yet exist. Maine's platform deadline is now September 1, 2027. The federal bill that cleared committee in May 2026 dropped the telematics mandate.
Did the federal REPAIR Act pass?
No. In May 2026 the House Energy and Commerce Committee set aside its full text and voted 48-1 for the Motor Vehicle Modernization Act (H.R. 7389). That bill would codify the 2014 and 2015 repair MOUs and let the FTC enforce them. It still needs a House floor vote, Senate passage and a signature, and none of the sources reviewed reported floor action.
Sources
- www.epa.gov (www.epa.gov)
- www.law.cornell.edu (www.law.cornell.edu)
- consumer.ftc.gov (consumer.ftc.gov)
- www.ftc.gov (www.ftc.gov)
- www.gao.gov (www.gao.gov)
- www.maine.gov (www.maine.gov)
- www.fleetmaintenance.com (www.fleetmaintenance.com)
- www.autobodynews.com (www.autobodynews.com)
- www.nelsonmullins.com (www.nelsonmullins.com)
- www.repairerdrivennews.com (www.repairerdrivennews.com)
- www.repairerdrivennews.com (www.repairerdrivennews.com)
Every source above was retrieved and checked to resolve on October 5, 2026.